Your Search Results
Charmaine Yoest has an interesting post about the Capps Amendment designed to set up accounting mechanisms to ensure tax dollars do not directly fund abortions. An accounting mechanism? The problem is that direct funding may be blocked, but there is no way to ensure indirect funding is not used for abortions. This is another example…
Barak Obama has been a busy soul over the past two years. Now might be a good time to take a look at some of his achievements.
Is it wrong for me to assume most government bureaucrats are lefties and thus carry the usual lefty baggage with them, including, it’s not a life, it’s a clump of cells, it’s not a heart beat, it’s a heart tone? Make no mistake, government bureaucrats will never view someone else’s life in the same manner as they…
So much for compromise and working in good faith. Our country may be lost … lost to innovation, prosperity, economic growth and good will. Your federal government has so much power and cash they can simply steal from the people and use cash to buy off the votes of other Congress-critters.
Many Democrats are concerned about the language in the $1.2 trillion health care presented by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that allows for a loophole – there’s that word again – to indirectly fund abortion.
A better title for this post might be David v. Golliath, as once again, David wins the battle. Only this time the battle involves Obamacare’s directive that all employers must provide insurance coverage for abortions and contraceptives.
Last week, the Obama administration offered solutions to two self-inflicted wounds.
This so called compromise does not change a single thing. It’s a late Friday afternoon gimmick, it’s fraud, they are trying to hoodwink and bamboozle you.
During a press briefing yesterday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney mentioned he thought the Obama administration had worked to find “the appropriate balance between religious beliefs and the need to provide preventive services to American women.”