Your Search Results
Two stories from the news wire today just have me totally baffled. I’m not always thinking “we’re doomed”, but if the Obama administration is considering a national sales tax of 10 percent or more, and has a dork working for him who thinks painting all the roofs in the world white will help stop global…
This is perhaps the best debate ever, simply because Congressman Dana Rohrabaher wins.
Years ago when the global warming team realized the globe was not warming, they made a dedicated and complete marketing campaign change. They changed their tag line from global warming to climate change. Again, this was a marketing decision. Instead of heating up, the world would experience more extreme weather. Not even that is happening.
Yes, you read that correctly. It seems that we once again have “global warming”. This is in contrast to the unusually cold temperatures we had two years ago, that forced the left to rename their cause “climate change”, or, if you prefer, “global climate disaster”.
Other than Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill that is. Let me, as they say, begin at the beginning.
For the past two years, the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature team at University of California, Berkley has been sorting through two centuries of temperature readings, over 1.6 billion in all.
Update: This is my bad. I was in such a hurry to post this after watching I forgot who tipped me off. Of course it had to be the Instapundit. My bad. Tiny post, so visit the whole site. I debated posting this, but after watching it for the second time, I think it’s a…
Another good example of how government regulation – in this case climate change legislation – can have unintended consequences, specifically higher food prices.
This would be comical, were it not so tragic. On Monday, the leaders of the G-77 walked out of the Copenhagen summit dealing with “global climate change”. They only left for several hours before returning, but, why they left is telling.