Voter fraud is a huge issue if your vote has been invalidated

In 2007, The New York Times noted the five-year effort by the Bush administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation found little evidence of voter fraud. Even if it is rare, it is an egregious violation of the rights of individuals whose votes are invalidated by voter fraud.

A few states around the country have implemented or will implement laws that simply require voters show a government ID when they vote. They want to protect the people who can legally vote from having their votes invalidated by an illegal vote. President Obama’s DOJ think that step is some sort of egregious violation of the rights of hispanics in Texas who may not have the opportunity to pick up a government-issued ID.

The Justice Department blocked Texas’ new voter-identification law Monday, arguing that it targets the state’s Hispanics — and igniting yet another clash between President Obama’s administration and a GOP-run state.

Texas is the second state to have its voter-ID law rejected by the Justice Department, which has cast a critical eye on Republican-controlled legislatures as they move to combat both illegal immigration and voter fraud.

Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez said he was using the federal government’s power under the Voting Rights Act to block the state’s law. He said the data show that Hispanics could be twice as likely as other groups to lack the right kind of identification.

You see, it’s the GOP-run states and the Republican-controlled legislatures that are the problem here, not the people of those states who demand their legal votes – every single one of them – count. But Obama doesn’t think much about the rights of legal residents of GOP states, especially when they’re on the boarder with Mexico.

We’ve discussed this before, but think how frequently you’re asked for a legal ID. Certainly the Obama administration would argue everyone needs to provide a government-issued legal ID to fly on a commercial airline right? How come Obama is not suing the TSA (itself) for requiring IDs to fly? Certainly Hispanics – who could be “twice as likely as other groups to lack the right kind of identification” – are being discriminated against for simply wanting to fly somewhere.

This issue is not a hysterical reaction by the GOP. There are certainly tens of thousands of voters who go to the polls and vote when they are not legally able to do so. Democrats may think that’s not a big deal (gee, I wonder why), but for those of you who have had their vote completely invalidated by an illegal vote, it seems the Voting Rights Act and the Obama administration could not give a damn about you.

Ed Morrissey notes the DOJ has most likely sued Texas under Section 5 of the Civil Rights Act. My emphasis in bold.

We covered the fight over Section 5 at the end of last year.  Texas offers another test case for the continuation of the DoJ’s supervision of southern states nearly five decades after the CRA’s passage.  The Supreme Court nearly dismantled Section 5 in 2009, deciding to let the question rest for a more direct case than Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. Holder.  The decision in that case spoke about the court’s skepticism of the law, though, and in an 8-1 decision in which most of the liberal members of the court participated.  The importance of Section 5 is that without it, the DoJ would have to find explicit discrimination in voter laws in the southern states, rather than objecting on the basis that Perez “cannot conclude that the state has sustained its burden” of proving non-discrimination, akin to making the state — and the voters who approve such measures — prove its innocence.

Posted in ,

Steve McGough

Steve's a part-time conservative blogger. Steve grew up in Connecticut and has lived in Washington, D.C. and the Bahamas. He resides in Connecticut, where he’s comfortable six months of the year.


  1. Murphy on March 13, 2012 at 9:04 am

    This may scare you but my boss lost the drivers license before getting a plane to Dulles Airport. They accepted the company issued ID card I created in word and laminated! Oh yeah it had a photo (from 6 years ago), a bar code, a valid date and signature. But it did not meet? TSA ID requirements for Airport checkpoints.

  2. Plainvillian on March 13, 2012 at 9:26 am

    Thanks to Federal privacy laws, I had to show my photo ID to get a copy of my own hospital records.? Should that be more important than the franchise?

  3. Dimsdale on March 13, 2012 at 10:19 am

    So let’s see: in Texas, it was the hispanics that couldn’t manage to get proper ID.? In North Carolina, it was blacks.? What next, homeless people?? When do these politically preferred groups get tired of being the poster boys for incompetence and helplessness?
    Photo IDs are required to get a Driver’s license, fly, buy alcohol, buy cigarettes, apply for welfare, apply for food stamps, cash a check, purchase a firearm (like you wouldn’t believe!), make any large credit card purchase, open a bank account, rent an apartment , be admitted to a hospital, get a marriage license etc. to name a few.
    How do these people get through life?
    Now look at the attempt in this state to remove any “need” requirement for absentee ballots.? Add that to motor voter, same day voting and New Haven’s infamous attempt to let illegals vote like real citizens.?? You know what this adds up to.? Fraud on a massive, unmanageable scale.

  4. ricbee on March 13, 2012 at 10:10 pm

    A little voter fraud can go a long way,witness Bridgeport & Corrupticut’s? election of Malloy.

    • Lynn on March 15, 2012 at 8:19 am

      Exactly, Ric. I am sickened that no one in CT has the guts to do anything to stop the voter fraud here. Try as we might, work as hard as we might. This election is the most important election in my lifetime, and I fear it will be stolen.? Those who steal it will comfort themselves by saying, “Means justifies Ends”.?

    • Murphy on March 15, 2012 at 8:48 am

      Me thinks that was Bitchowitch’s plan all along

    • Lynn on March 15, 2012 at 12:06 pm

      Watch out you’ll have N.O.W. after you, because only conservatives say mean things.


The website's content and articles were migrated to a new framework in October 2023. You may see [shortcodes in brackets] that do not make any sense. Please ignore that stuff. We may fix it at some point, but we do not have the time now.

You'll also note comments migrated over may have misplaced question marks and missing spaces. All comments were migrated, but trackbacks may not show.

The site is not broken.