US Government: We have a lot of oil

Bury. Heads. In. Sand. Well, I guess the Obama administration is burying their own heads in the oil shale deposits in Wyoming, Colorado and Utah. The US Government Accounting Office (GAO) released a report last Thursday morning detailing 1.5 trillion – yes trillion – barrels of oil that is recoverable from the Green River Formation.

And President Obama keeps telling you the United States only has 2 percent of the world’s oil reserves. Liberals can spin it and the numbers any way they want, but what it comes down to is we’ve got a ton of oil. As a matter of fact, the largest known reserves of oil are not in the Middle East, rather they are right here in the United States, and the federal government and the Obama administration won’t let anyone touch it.

Directly from the GAO testimony, which by the way refers to an October 2010 study that does not seem to have been made public at the time. Wonder why?

In its October 2010 report, GAO noted that oil shale development presents the following opportunities for the United States:

  • Increasing domestic oil production. Tapping the vast amounts of oil locked within U.S. oil shale formations could go a long way toward satisfying the nation’s future oil demands. Oil shale deposits in the Green River Formation are estimated to contain up to 3 trillion barrels of oil, half of which may be recoverable, which is about equal to the entire world’s proven oil reserves.
  • Socioeconomic benefits. Development of oil shale resources could lead to the creation of jobs, increases in wealth, and increases in tax and royalty payments to federal and state governments for oil produced on their lands. The extent of these benefits, however, is unknown at this time because the ultimate size of the industry is uncertain

The GAO goes on to note a few items that absolutely must be considered. First, you have to be able to get the oil out of the ground with minimal impact to the environment. This is important of course, and oil companies understand that. But big government liberals hate the oil companies as a matter of principle no matter what they do, so let’s leave it at that.

Second, getting to that oil in a responsible way is more expensive than accessing oil – as an example – in ANWAR. That too needs to be considered.

But for goodness sakes, we’re the best country in the world filled with smart individuals … we can get the oil at a reasonable cost with little impact on the environment. But no! The Obama administration thinks the oil companies and the people of the United States can’t handle the responsibility, so they lock you out.

They of course, know better than you or anyone else.

Jazz Shaw over at Hot Air writes…

If we move forward on this aggressively, the industry can safely access these resources which would significantly strengthen our hand on the international stage. But with the wrong approach, Washington could hog tie energy developers with excessive, expensive regulations or shut the entire process down by failing to issue permits to develop resources on these federal lands.

The public disclosure of these reserves is good news, but it’s only the beginning. And while I feel some trepidation in saying it, I’m afraid the ball is in Barack Obama’s court.

Posted in ,

Steve McGough

Steve's a part-time conservative blogger. Steve grew up in Connecticut and has lived in Washington, D.C. and the Bahamas. He resides in Connecticut, where he’s comfortable six months of the year.

6 Comments

  1. Dimsdale on May 15, 2012 at 11:18 am

    Fossil fuels are far more physically accessible than they are politically accessible.?? Even if sold on the world market, domestically produced oil is not subject to, say, the closing of the Strait of Hormuz, as is constantly threatened by the Iraqis, or the whims of OPEC.? If the price goes up, profits come HERE, not to terrorist supporting states.? Win-win-win etc.
    ?
    Lefties are comfortable with their “heads in the oil shale” because it seems familiar, considering where their heads usually are.



  2. sammy22 on May 15, 2012 at 11:26 am

    You need a lot of water into steam to get the “oil” out of sands/shale. I suppose there is plenty of water where the sands are. I vote for converting truck/car engines to natural gas to keep a lot of money in the US instead of abroad. BTW, I thought that finding large reserves of recoverable oil would drop the price of crude; have not seen much of that yet.



  3. Murphy on May 15, 2012 at 12:11 pm

    Yeah but look at what big bother worry’s about
    “Oil shale development can bring an influx of
    workers, who along with their families can put additional stress on local
    infrastructure such as roads, housing, municipal water systems, and schools.
    Development from expansion of extractive industries, such as oil shale or oil
    and gas, has typically followed a ?boom and bust? cycle, making planning for
    growth difficult for local governments”
    ?
    GMAFB



  4. PatRiot on May 15, 2012 at 10:08 pm

    These DC people are control freaks – 2 options here.
    1.? There is a boat load of oil.
    2.? This is a ruse.?
    They can use both as control of big business (capitalism), the world economy and the destiny of other countries.??No, not for the average American’s sake.? This is so they can?feed their own egos.? It is an attempt to gain back power.? Power they squandered?because of their lies, overspending and lack of respect for: 1.??The Constitution, and 2. the sovereignty of individuals and other countries.?



  5. JBS on May 16, 2012 at 8:46 am

    More oil available to the economy is NOT what Obama wants. His perfect national view is the sheeple driving around in glorified golf carts powered by anything but petroleum (algae perhaps?). His Nibs will, of course, still be motored around in the Beast, oil powered, not economical and it is not environmentally friendly. (And jet everywhere . . .)
    The reality is we need a new administration, one with a markedly pro American view. The current policy on development of? “government lands” is negative, akin to the “suppress forest fires policy” that led to burning down millions of acres of forest and subsequent pollution of many waterways, etc. Extracting the oil from the shale could be done economically and without ruining the landscape. All it would take is the political will and faith in America.
    We need a new President for all the people and to make the US strong again.



square-oil-shale

The website's content and articles were migrated to a new framework in October 2023. You may see [shortcodes in brackets] that do not make any sense. Please ignore that stuff. We may fix it at some point, but we do not have the time now.

You'll also note comments migrated over may have misplaced question marks and missing spaces. All comments were migrated, but trackbacks may not show.

The site is not broken.