The founder of the tea party calls Tom Friedman and idiot
This is a classic piece of video brought to you by the daily caller via powerline. CNBC’s Rick Santelli Faced off against New York Times columnist Tom Friedman on the subject of whether or not Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. It is of course. A Ponzi scheme is when future investors pay the returns of past investors. By itself it is unsustainable, and that is social security. Tom loses the argument which, as with all arguments with liberals, descends into name calling.
The kick off point of course is the Republican debate where Gov Rick Perry won’t back down on calling the sustainability of social security a ponzi scheme. Tom”if only we could be China for a day” Friedman won’t back down either and it’s off to the races. Awesome.
Says Scott Johnson at Powerline:
Is Social Security something of a Ponzi scheme? It seems to me to partake of its essential elements, requiring new “investors” to pay off previous “investors.” The trappings of the program are sufficiently misleading that they would land principals operating in the private sector in serious trouble. Thanks to a variety of material misrepresentations, as John recently noted, many Americans still believe that the government maintains an “account” in their name holding assets; some even think that their “account” contains their own contributions, carefully set aside for their retirement by Franklin Roosevelt or his successors.
13 Comments
The website's content and articles were migrated to a new framework in October 2023. You may see [shortcodes in brackets] that do not make any sense. Please ignore that stuff. We may fix it at some point, but we do not have the time now.
You'll also note comments migrated over may have misplaced question marks and missing spaces. All comments were migrated, but trackbacks may not show.
The site is not broken.
Friedman is such a pompous ass.? And unjustifiably upbeat about the subject matter.? Can’t stand him.
Friedman said SS “made promises it can’t keep in full”p, and “burdens our children”.? He dismisses the allegation of being a Ponzi scheme nonsense because it is “a criminal endeavor”.
?
As winnie notes, pompous ass covers it nicely.? He doesn’t want to admit the truth.? I am grateful to Perry for standing firm on his convictions.
?
The only difference between a Ponzi scheme and Social Security is that the latter is government approved.?? Just like the lottery or Keno:? the only difference between that and the bookie down the street is that the government declared their version legal.
?
Don’t get me started on taxes and protection money!? 😉
Why is Friedman called in as an alleged expert on this anyway?
Friedman is a nattering nabob of nonsense whose only value is that he offers a model of what animates the radical left.
“if only we could be China ah, ah, ah for just a day” Friedman is an arrogant stuffed shirt?elitist..?Whoops, I digress….. SS is the ultimate Ponzi scheme, the gold standard of Ponzi schemes…. do a simple graph depicitng the number of workers?needed to support receipients from say 1950 with 5 year increments leading to 2011…… it forms a perfect pyramid as in pyramid scheme aka Ponzi scheme…. Bernie Madoff?would be proud!?
Why not appoint Bernie Madoff Social Security ‘czar’?? What say, Bobo?
Phil. LOL, what a perfect SS czar, and BOBO! You made my day! Thanks
Just remember, little cuties, to keep paying into SS for me.
Sammy you know my dad said ?the same thing when you were working.
Now we are saying it to our great grandchildren…
Excuse me, SAMMY is saying it to our great grandchildren.
Now I know why they have the obamacare death panels, withhold treatment for the elderly, they die and no more SS payouts.
ABO and now you’ve got it. Tragic isn’t it?