Take a few minutes today to read Prof. Walter Williams’ current Creators Syndicate column, Economic Chaos Ahead.
Last week, the Congressional Budget Office released the results of a study comparing average household income in 1979 to average household income in 2005. Over this 25 year period, the top 20% of households had a 10 point increase in their incomes (with most going to the top 1%) while the other 80% of households saw an income decline of 2-3%. Read more
As Ed Morrissey at Hot Air said so many months ago , “if your are going to make up a number, why don’t you just say the stimulus created or saved a gazillion jobs?” Indeed … and Charles nails it. Say whatever you want, make up whatever you want, the hard numbers tell another story. Read more
In his recent “pep talks” about Obamacare, the President has frequently mentioned the Congressional Budget Office’s findings to support his arguments. As I have read those findings, as well as those of the Office of the Actuary for Medicare and Medicaid (OACT) I am perplexed by the President’s comments.
We are told that Obamacare will reduce everyone’s premiums. Here is what the CBO actually said:
CBO found that premiums in the individual market will rise by 10% to 13% more than if Congress did nothing. Family policies under the status quo are projected to cost $13,100 on average, but under ObamaCare will jump to $15,200.
We are told that Obamacare will not only be deficit neutral, but, will actually create a $139 billion dollar surplus over ten years. The only problem with that statement is that the Senate bill does not include what is known as the “doctor fix”. Although originally in all versions of Obamacare, it has been dropped from the final Senate version. Why? Because it will add $250 billion to the cost of Obamacare, making the bill not only not deficit neutral, but, in fact, a $110 billion deficit over the first 10 years. Not to worry, docs, the “doctor fix” is now in a separate bill.
Here’s what the OACT says could happen if the federal government doesn’t update it’s payment rates to doctors:
Over time, a sustained reduction in payment updates…would cause Medicare [and Medicaid] payment rates to grow more slowly than…the providers costs of furnishing services to beneficiaries. Thus providers…could find it difficult to remain profitable, and might end their participation in the program…possibly jeopardizing access to care…
Another reason President Obama can claim the bill to be “deficit neutral” over the first 10 years is because of the new federal disability program (CLASS) contained in the Senate bill. It will begin collecting premiums in 2010, but would not have to pay out any claims until 2015. In the interim, those premiums are counted as “income” to defray the cost of Obamacare. Here’s what the OACT had to say about CLASS:
…we estimate a net federal savings for the CLASS program of $39 billion during the first 9 years of operation-the first 5 of which are prior to the commencenent of benefit payments…in 2025 and later, projected benefits exceed premium revenues…
We are also told that Obamacare will actually reduce the amount of money spent in this country on health care (i.e., bend the cost curve). Not so, according to OACT. By 2019 under Obamacare we will be spending 21.1% of our GDP on health care, versus 20.8% without Obamacare.
And, finally, President Obama says that Obamacare will extend the life of Medicare, now set to go broke in 2017, by five more years. It won’t, according to a letter from the CBO. That letter explains to Congress that it can’t cut $500 billion from Medicare and claim to have extended Medicare’s life by 5 years, while simultaneously using that same $500 billion to insure those who are currently uninsured.
I don’t usually write a post of this length, but, I am growing increasingly tired of hearing claims that are, charitably, well, just untrue.
The CBO is projecting the White House underestimated the deficit by more than $2 trillion dollars from 2010 to 2019.
The administration is expecting the budget deficit to total $7.0 trillion from 2010 to 2019, but CBO is expecting a total deficit of $9.27 trillion.
But here’s the kicker … Nancy “Pay Go” Pelosi doesn’t care …
“Our priorities are the same,” Pelosi said. “This budget is a statement of our values and our investments in education, health care and the health of America. That includes prevention as well as care, and the energy initiatives as well as tax relief for 95 percent of the American people, as well as an approach that takes the deficit down. Those are the priorities of the budget.”
This coming from the woman who in 2007 insisted that George Bush bow to pay go … and the same woman who in January, insisted that the stimulus package not add to the deficit.