Sotomayor is (gulp) … a Catholic – Part 3

June 3, 2009 | Jim Vicevich | |

It’s now officially out of hand.  We saw this coming a week ago when we just happened to catch liberal talk show host Bill Press bring it up. We made fun of it then, hardly believing that this would either be a plus in bringing Catholics on board … or a minus. But we so underestimated it all, because we never saw the abortion issue coming.

First the AP chimed in here … calming liberal fears by assuring all she may be a Catholic … but not really a Catholic. Now even the Catholics says she’s not really a Catholic … well practicing… which is why Dianne Feinstein is “way on board.”

The only thing no one has mentioned is … the Supreme Court has too many Catholics …. way out of proportion with the population …. UNTIL NOW.

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYOWoadxUqs

OK … stop it … now. Let’s be clear … she’s Catholic … but not too Catholic and thus will not upset the court balance … OK? Or will she? Oooooooooh.

Posted in

Jim Vicevich

Jim is a veteran broadcaster and conservative/libertarian blogger with more than 25 years experience in TV and radio. Jim's was the long-term host of The Jim Vicevich Show on WTIC 1080 in Hartford from 2004 through 2019. Prior to radio, Jim worked as a business and financial reporter for NBC30 - the NBC owned TV station in Hartford - and as business editor at WFSB-TV in Hartford for 14 years while earning six Emmy nominations and three Telly Awards.

6 Comments

  1. Steve McGough on June 3, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    Should we check the color of their eyes? Can't have too many of those freaky blue-eyed people on the court ya know…



    • rush on June 3, 2009 at 3:41 pm

      Steve,

      You make a great point.Keep up the good work.



  2. Dimsdale on June 3, 2009 at 2:42 pm

    Don't you just love the fact that Rush is now saying that since she is a Catholic, she might actually be acceptable to him?  Now if there is anything in the world that will put doubt into a liberal's mind, it's an endorsement, partial or whole, but Rush Limbaugh.



  3. Dimsdale on June 4, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    Remember when Bush had the opportunity to make an appointment to the SCOTUS, and there was all this gnashing of teeth, beating of breast etc., about "litmus tests?"

    I guess only liberals can have litmus tests…



    • rush on June 5, 2009 at 12:33 am

      Great point Dims,I forgot about that.



  4. Dimsdale on June 6, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    Hat tip to Powerline: the latest Quinnipiac poll, oft quoted when the results are in keeping with the media's.   You will see why this one didn't quite pass muster with the liberal media.

    http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=130…



The website's content and articles were migrated to a new framework in October 2023. You may see [shortcodes in brackets] that do not make any sense. Please ignore that stuff. We may fix it at some point, but we do not have the time now.

You'll also note comments migrated over may have misplaced question marks and missing spaces. All comments were migrated, but trackbacks may not show.

The site is not broken.