Sotomayor is (gulp) … a Catholic – Part 3

It’s now officially out of hand.  We saw this coming a week ago when we just happened to catch liberal talk show host Bill Press bring it up. We made fun of it then, hardly believing that this would either be a plus in bringing Catholics on board … or a minus. But we so underestimated it all, because we never saw the abortion issue coming.

First the AP chimed in here … calming liberal fears by assuring all she may be a Catholic … but not really a Catholic. Now even the Catholics says she’s not really a Catholic … well practicing… which is why Dianne Feinstein is “way on board.”

The only thing no one has mentioned is … the Supreme Court has too many Catholics …. way out of proportion with the population …. UNTIL NOW.


OK … stop it … now. Let’s be clear … she’s Catholic … but not too Catholic and thus will not upset the court balance … OK? Or will she? Oooooooooh.

6 replies
  1. Dimsdale
    Dimsdale says:

    Don't you just love the fact that Rush is now saying that since she is a Catholic, she might actually be acceptable to him?  Now if there is anything in the world that will put doubt into a liberal's mind, it's an endorsement, partial or whole, but Rush Limbaugh.

  2. Dimsdale
    Dimsdale says:

    Remember when Bush had the opportunity to make an appointment to the SCOTUS, and there was all this gnashing of teeth, beating of breast etc., about "litmus tests?"

    I guess only liberals can have litmus tests…

Comments are closed.