Sotomayor is (gulp) … a Catholic – Part 3
It’s now officially out of hand. We saw this coming a week ago when we just happened to catch liberal talk show host Bill Press bring it up. We made fun of it then, hardly believing that this would either be a plus in bringing Catholics on board … or a minus. But we so underestimated it all, because we never saw the abortion issue coming.
First the AP chimed in here … calming liberal fears by assuring all she may be a Catholic … but not really a Catholic. Now even the Catholics says she’s not really a Catholic … well practicing… which is why Dianne Feinstein is “way on board.”
The only thing no one has mentioned is … the Supreme Court has too many Catholics …. way out of proportion with the population …. UNTIL NOW.
OK … stop it … now. Let’s be clear … she’s Catholic … but not too Catholic and thus will not upset the court balance … OK? Or will she? Oooooooooh.
Should we check the color of their eyes? Can't have too many of those freaky blue-eyed people on the court ya know…
You make a great point.Keep up the good work.
Don't you just love the fact that Rush is now saying that since she is a Catholic, she might actually be acceptable to him? Now if there is anything in the world that will put doubt into a liberal's mind, it's an endorsement, partial or whole, but Rush Limbaugh.
Remember when Bush had the opportunity to make an appointment to the SCOTUS, and there was all this gnashing of teeth, beating of breast etc., about "litmus tests?"
I guess only liberals can have litmus tests…
Great point Dims,I forgot about that.
Hat tip to Powerline: the latest Quinnipiac poll, oft quoted when the results are in keeping with the media's. You will see why this one didn't quite pass muster with the liberal media.