Obama administration attacks school choice

By offering school choice, many cities – including Washington D.C. – have been able to provide some kids with the opportunity to attend better performing schools. Following marching orders from the National Education Association, the Obama administration intends to let a popular D.C. program end.

As mentioned here and here, the administration is taking some heat after the Wall Street Journal introduced us to the Parker family.

Like the Obama girls, Sarah and James [Parker] attend the Sidwell Friends School in our nation’s capital. Unlike the Obama girls, they could not afford the school without the $7,500 voucher they receive from the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship program. Unfortunately, a spending bill the Senate takes up this week includes a poison pill that would kill this program — and with it perhaps the Parker children’s hopes for a Sidwell diploma.

Look, the Obama family decision to send their kids to Sidwell Friends School was probably a good move. Not only does the Obama family have the income to afford tuition, there are security concerns I’m sure Sidwell is familiar with.

But why take the opportunity from other families?

More about the programs offered
The Washington Scholarship Program (WSP) provides varying scholarship opportunities funded with private and public money. One opportunity is the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program (D.C. OSP).

The D.C. OSP provides genuine school choice for low-income families in the form of scholarships for children to attend K-12 non-public schools within the District’s boundaries. The maximum annual scholarship amount of $7,500 per child is available for families at or below 185% of the federal poverty level ($39,220 for a family of four). Families must reapply and prove their eligibility each year.

Established in 2003 as a fully funded government pilot, the pre-2008 budget allocation seems to have been less than $13 million ($7,500 x 1,715 kids). The Bush administration suggested increasing this amount by $5 million in April of 2008.

So, how well was the program doing? The Heartland Institute’s John Schilling, chief of staff and director of national projects for the DC-based Alliance for School Choice, chimes in.

“This is a program that is working phenomenally well for nearly 2,000 very low-income children and enjoys overwhelming parental satisfaction,” Schilling noted, “yet [it] receives significantly less funding than DCPS or charter schools.”

Even the Heritage Foundation reviewed reports and suggested expansion in a Web memo last month.

I know, you’ve often heard me – and other libertarians/conservatives – flat out state that the government should not be involved with education at all. In this example – as with other school choice voucher programs across the nation – this is a perfect example of bipartisanship destroyed by liberal politicians.

Damn do I cringe at that word. Anyway…

As noted in a previous post, Obama’s current appropriations bill increases the District’s school budget by $20 million. The argument from liberals will be they are closing one program and replacing it with more funding for the public school system.

I’m certain the parents of Sarah and James Parker are confident that if their kids must return to the public school system, they will get the same service and quality they received from Sidwell.

The federal government is, after all, throwing more funding at the public system than was provided to the school choice program!

Good luck with that, since we’ve proven more dollars do not improve student performance. When will the politicians, the NEA and parents come to the same realization? By taking this funding and giving it to the public system, students and families who who have tasted educational success will learn an important lesson. If the government gives it to you, they can certainly take it away.

4 replies
  1. Dimsdale
    Dimsdale says:

    This exemplifies two problems with liberals: 1) they fervently believe that throwing money (other people's) at a problem will solve it, and 2) no matter how loud they doth protest, they have absolutely no intention of actually helping the poor and disadvantaged because to do so would render them unnecessary.

    To wit: they are throwing untold trillions of dollars at economically unfeasible programs in a futile attempt to stem the Dow nosedive.  And let us not forget the pork slathered all over this bill.  Good money after bad?  Ya think?  Or more importantly: do they think?

    And let us not forget all of the money they are throwing at the DC schools to get schools and programs that should be punishable by prolonged jail terms with no parole.  The voucher program the Democrats and their NEA puppet masters are trying to kill are infinitely more effective at educating children at HALF the cost of the regular school funding?  The NEA is out to crush any voucher program because it will allow people to vote with their feet and run, not walk, away from NEA sanctioned houses of ignorance and social experimentation.  This is not only criminal, it borders on criminally insane.  And most importantly, it mostly affects not just the poor, but poor blacks.  And they dare to call Republicans racist bigots?  Insert howls of derisive laughter.  What percentage of blacks voted for Obama again?

    Yet the socialist Democrats will sit there with straight faces, and insist Republicans are the bad guys, while they are selling out poor blacks to repay relatively rich teacher's unions with demonstrably pi$$ poor schools.

    Why do the blacks in DC, or anywhere for that matter, fall for this crap?  Why does the country fall for any of the crap spouted by Obama, Reid and Pelosi?

    Ron Reagan, where are you when we need you most?

  2. Wyndeward
    Wyndeward says:

    If spending money made a good school district, Washington DC would be an educational utopia…

Comments are closed.