Federal judge: Christian-owned business must provide “morning after pill” coverage

A federal judge told Hobby Lobby – a Christian-owned and run business that employs thousands in more than 500 retail locations – they must provide coverage for the “morning after pill” and “week after pill” in their health insurance plan. The judge ruled since Hobby Lobby was not a church or religious group as defined by Obamacare regulations, they do not qualify for an exemption.

I knew this would eventually come up, but I guess I’m surprised it came up so soon. Good.

This is about the First Amendment and religious freedom … not a woman’s access to health care. The access argument is completely wrong simply because employees are not cutting off access, they just refuse to pay for the morning after pill. They employee can go buy it themselves. From LifeNews.com.

The privately held retail chain with more than 500 arts and crafts stores in 41 states filed a lawsuit against the Obama administration over its HHS mandate. The company says it would face $1.3 million in fines on a daily basis starting in January if it fails to comply with the mandate, which requires religious employers to pay for or refer women for abortion-cause drugs that violate their conscience or religious beliefs.

The judge said their moral sensibilities are only being “indirectly burdened”…

The court did not question that the Green family has sincere religious beliefs forbidding them from participating in abortion. The court ruled, however, that those beliefs were only “indirectly” burdened by the mandate’s requirement that they provide free coverage for specific, abortion-inducing drugs in Hobby Lobby’s self-funded insurance plan.

I’ve been saying over and over and over again, human rights and Constitutional rights exist simultaneously between people. It’s immoral and unlawful to practice a right if it limits or takes a right from someone else. You can’t just walk into someone’s home or business and take something and declare it’s “your right” to have it. Sorry, it does not work that way.

This Obama administration thinks if you own your own business, you leave your rights at home and they do not apply at the for-profit business you run. I’m sorry, but Christians don’t manage their lives that way.

Kyle Duncan, general counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, sums up the Obama administration’s argument pretty well I think.

The administration’s arguments in this case are shocking. Here’s what they are saying: once someone starts a “secular” business, he categorically loses any right to run that business in accordance with his conscience. The business owner simply leaves her First Amendment rights at home when she goes to work at the business she built. Kosher butchers around the country must be shocked to find that they now run “secular” businesses. On this view of the world, even a seller of Bibles is “secular.” Hobby Lobby’s affiliate, Mardel, sells Bibles and other Christian-themed material, but because it makes a profit the government has now declared it “secular.”

The administration’s position here — while astonishing — is actually consistent with its overall view of the place of religion in civil society. After all, this is the administration who argued in the Hosanna-Tabor case last year in the Supreme Court that the religion clauses of the First Amendment offered no special protection to a church’s right to choose its ministers — a position that the Court rejected 9-0. This is the administration which has taken to referring to “freedom of worship” instead of “freedom of religion” — suggesting that religious freedom consists in being free to engage in private rituals and prayers, but not in carrying your religious convictions into public life. And this is the administration who crafted a “religious employer” exemption to the HHS mandate so narrow that a Catholic charity does not qualify for conscience protection if it serves non-Catholic poor people.

More from The Hill, Fox News, the Associated Press, and Gateway Pundit.

Posted in ,

Steve McGough

Steve's a part-time conservative blogger. Steve grew up in Connecticut and has lived in Washington, D.C. and the Bahamas. He resides in Connecticut, where he’s comfortable six months of the year.


  1. Murphy on November 21, 2012 at 12:23 pm

    Guess that will cover his son’s business, Mardel Christian and Education Supply Stores also.
    As the internet cats says Oh No no

  2. Dimsdale on November 21, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    First they came for the Christians, and you said nothing….
    Notice how everything like fairness, freedom, rights etc. are being redefined as “social justice”?
    We are now on the highway, excuse me, busway to ruin…

  3. SeeingRed on November 21, 2012 at 1:22 pm

    I’m sure the MSM will be reporting this…soon…not….

  4. Lynn on November 21, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    Well, Steve, it comes down to the “you didn’t build your business” phrase. This administration’s position is the Government made all the businesses. The government can do whatever they want, it is “their” business.

    • Dimsdale on November 21, 2012 at 7:46 pm

      And “their money”.

  5. JBS on November 22, 2012 at 7:43 am

    Obama’s assault on religion and private business continues.?
    I am curious what the exemption is for Democrat donors who might have some religious scruples.
    I forgot. Democrats don’t have any problem violating a Christian’s religious beliefs. Or, a soul, or principles, or conscience, or . . . respect for life?

  6. JollyRoger on November 23, 2012 at 10:04 am

    Those not on Obama’s constituent list reside on Obama’s enemies list!

  7. Dimsdale on November 23, 2012 at 12:06 pm

    Can we call this seriously (Sandra) “Fluked up” reasoning from the bench?

  8. Lynn on November 23, 2012 at 4:32 pm

    Ha, Ha, Ha…..why yes we can.

  9. dennis on November 26, 2012 at 1:05 pm

    None of this matters to the Government. The 48%? that “take” will not care about this ruling because they will still get their gifts every month and still vote to keep getting their gifts. When all employers realize what it is going to cost them to have insurance for their employees they will stop offering , pay the fine and send them to the “exchanges”. Single payer anyone?


The website's content and articles were migrated to a new framework in October 2023. You may see [shortcodes in brackets] that do not make any sense. Please ignore that stuff. We may fix it at some point, but we do not have the time now.

You'll also note comments migrated over may have misplaced question marks and missing spaces. All comments were migrated, but trackbacks may not show.

The site is not broken.