Do we need Medicare reform?

As you know, Representative Paul Ryan (R. Wi.) has proposed that Congress tackle the looming fiscal disaster that exists for Medicare.  A caller yesterday objected to any change because, as he put it, he has been paying into Medicare for years and wants to make sure he gets his money back. 

Aside from the fact that “his” money no longer exists as it has already been spent, let’s look at payments to Medicare over the years based upon a conversation I had with a friend of mine last night.

Medicare came into existence in 1966.  Since then both she and her employers have paid into the program.  Based upon the annual statements she has received from Social Security, through 2008, she and her employers have paid $44,564 into Medicare.  Using her earnings, and expected earnings until 2112 when she reaches 65, she and her employer will add approximately $8700 more to the Medicare pot.

So, next year when she is forced onto Medicare, she will have contributed approximately $53,000.  Look at your own annual statement and, as they say, do the math.

Now, let’s look at benefits.

Medicare calculates that it spent an average of $11,743 on beneficiaries in 2009, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Given those figures, ask yourself…do we need to reform Medicare?

Posted in ,

SoundOffSister

The Sound Off Sister was an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and special trial attorney for the Department of Justice, Criminal Division; a partner in the Florida law firm of Shutts & Bowen, and an adjunct professor at the University of Miami, School of Law. The Sound Off Sister offers frequent commentary concerning legislation making its way through Congress, including the health reform legislation passed in early 2010.

8 Comments

  1. Dimsdale on April 6, 2011 at 4:10 pm

    The worst part is that if you had invested that $53 large in even the most conservative account (intended), it would have gained interest over that same 46 years, doubtless accruing a slew of interest.  It is obvious what the tender ministrations of the government have done to that 53 large.

     

    MSA, anyone?



  2. Coffee Mug on April 7, 2011 at 3:34 am

    IF the money had been conservatively invested – it would have AT LEAST doubled or tripled in value  in that time frame.



  3. Lynn on April 7, 2011 at 3:40 am

    I like HSA's



  4. weregettinghosed on April 7, 2011 at 7:57 am

    It look so good on paper does it not? What the truth is, your money put in, went right back out, you only got a promise of medicare later on; meanwhile they spent it and well, now they do not have that money or enough flowing in to cover what needs to go out. Oh, dear, another ponzi scheme exposed.



  5. Tim-in-Alabama on April 7, 2011 at 11:35 am

    Paul Ryan wants to kill old people. The nerve. That's what Obamacare is for.



    • SoundOffSister on April 7, 2011 at 1:48 pm

      Tim, as always, you nailed it.



    • Dimsdale on April 8, 2011 at 8:55 am

      You are a man of enlightening brevity!   Bravo!



  6. brianh on April 7, 2011 at 1:29 pm

    Putting aside the Ponzi scheme, the $50K +/- plus interest should have been enough for Medicare PART A—which is all the money was collected for. You pay a premium for Part B, Part D, and probably even Part C when you enroll. But…those premium amounts are woefully inadequate and?so the government is subsidizing them?which accounts for?$200B+ of the annual deficit.



featured-medicare-maze

The website's content and articles were migrated to a new framework in October 2023. You may see [shortcodes in brackets] that do not make any sense. Please ignore that stuff. We may fix it at some point, but we do not have the time now.

You'll also note comments migrated over may have misplaced question marks and missing spaces. All comments were migrated, but trackbacks may not show.

The site is not broken.