Bi-partisan commission on reducing the debt – draft report

With the federal legislative session not exactly in full swing, you have plenty of time to review President Obama’s bi-partisan commission’s “how to reduce the debt” draft report. Unfortunatley, I don’t have time to read much this evening, but I wanted to provide you a link to the PDF for your reading pleasure.

The report – again, just in draft form – is only 24 pages. (I’m using the direct link from the fiscal commissions website.) What we’ll do is add at least one more post as RVO authors review the document. They are pointing out $200 billion in savings for 2015, split equally between domestic and defense spending.

A quick rundown of others writing on the subject this afternoon…

AP at Hot Air points out this is just a trial balloon draft.

Mind you, this “starting point” has arrived some nine months after Obama created the Commission, which he did only after a congressional attempt to create a different deficit commission died in the Senate. As for the specifics of the proposal, Tapper has a full rundown here although I recommend his post mainly for the apocalyptic quotes from hysterical progressives furious at the thought of reforming Social Security or — gasp — reducing the highest income tax brackets, both of which are endorsed by Bowles/Simpson. Sample reaction from Obama pal and AFL-CIO chief Richard Trumka: “The chairmen of the Deficit Commission just told working Americans to ‘Drop Dead.’”

TPM has a useful, detailed bullet-point summary of recommended spending cuts, tax increases, and entitlement reforms, but if you’re only interested in a broad overview, this CNN piece is better.

Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.-Not-Speaker-for-Long) has shot it down, and I guaranty you she has not read it.

Posted in

Steve McGough

Steve's a part-time conservative blogger. Steve grew up in Connecticut and has lived in Washington, D.C. and the Bahamas. He resides in Connecticut, where he’s comfortable six months of the year.

1 Comment

  1. winnie888 on November 10, 2010 at 3:05 pm

    From what I gather, one of the recommendations is raising the age of retirement to 69.  I expect 20-somethings to commence rioting a.s.a.p.

     



frontpg-cash-toilet-paper

The website's content and articles were migrated to a new framework in October 2023. You may see [shortcodes in brackets] that do not make any sense. Please ignore that stuff. We may fix it at some point, but we do not have the time now.

You'll also note comments migrated over may have misplaced question marks and missing spaces. All comments were migrated, but trackbacks may not show.

The site is not broken.