Are we heading for an Øbama illegal alien trifecta?
Fox News seems to have been the first (and maybe only?) news organization to report that the Øbama regime intends to close nine Border Patrol stations across four states. Nobody except mouthpieces for the administration is pleased with this move. Pleas to the Border Patrol chief and the Dept. of Homeland “Security” by Border Patrol agents, Texas politicians and town sheriffs have fallen on deaf ears, with U.S. Customs and Border Protection which responded:
“These deactivations are consistent with the strategic goal of securing America’s borders, and our objective of increasing and sustaining the certainty of arrest of those trying to enter our country illegally,” CBP spokesman Bill Brooks said in a statement. “By redeploying and reallocating resources at or near the border, CBP will maximize the effectiveness of its enforcement mandate and align our investments with our mission.”
True, the stations to be closed are in northern and central Texas and three other states, but according to the story, they see plenty of action. The important question is: will this be the beginning of a trend? Is it the goal of the Øbama regime to make the Border Patrol as sad as the TSA has become in its almost ridiculous desire to be politically correct?
It should be noted that the Øbama administration has attempted to close nine border stations (or create “unstaffed” stations) on the U.S. – Canada border. “Oddly” enough, the attempted closure of a “state-of-the-art border facility just a few hundred metres away in Churubusco, N.Y., using seven million dollars of federal infrastructure money, was opposed by Democrat NY Senator Chuck Shumer”, who stated
..our businesses and construction workers in the North Country depend on this project to meet their bottom line and provide for their families.
Surely a political consideration, and most surely one that Texas will not receive.
Wouldn’t a better solution be to put the unemployed to work instead of paying them to stay home, increasing the number of Border Patrol agents and building a more secure border, a border that is proving to be increasingly porous to illegals, drug traffickers and terrorist groups? Sure, they put those drones to use on the borders, mostly to get drug traffickers, a program which the LA Times said has been mostly ineffective. If it is your goal to buy votes by giving tacit amnesty to illegals by choosing not to prosecute the transgressors (invaders?), then what is the point?
Given the “selective prosecution” of illegals handed down by imperial edict from the White House, and now this selective shutdown of Border Patrol stations, what else will we need to create the perfect storm of border disintegration and collapsing the sovereignty of the country? Will the next “idea” be to allow more “sanctuary cities” or let Mexico annex the U.S.? Seriously, if you wanted to destroy the sovereignty of the country, could you think of better ways to do it?
Maybe it is time for another chapter to be added to the video from the people that made “If I wanted to see America fail”. Or another video titled “If I wanted America to become a third wold nation”. Sadly, this stuff is writing itself.
?These deactivations are consistent with….. the effectiveness of its enforcement mandate and align our investments with our mission.? – Newspeak or BS?? Both?
“what else will we need to create the perfect storm of border disintegration”
…. oh, I don’t know… maybe issue beanbag shells to our Border Patrol agents to use against drug cartel goons armed with AK47s supplied to them by ATF / DOJ.? Oh wait a minute, that’s already been done.?? Rest in peace, U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.
Exactly why this administration should be under the intense heat of scandal with Holder and possibly even Obama answering to a judge and not contemplating another four years of assault on the constitution.? Thank the MSM for largely burying “Fast And Furious”… had a republican administration been in charge you can bet your last dollar that the calls for impeachment would be shrill.
stinkfoot et al:? If we could make Clinton answer for his (ahem) “extracurricular activities” while in the white house, surely these jack booted thugs (O & Holder) can be made to answer for their criminal activities?
Not that I’m holding my breath, or anything but karma is a funny thing.
Except for being immigration scofflaws, illegal immigrants are our finest Americans and helping them obtain legal status ahead of those who follow the law is the right thing to do.
LOL, I’m with Tim. We need more voters, illegal or otherwise.
There are an estimated 12 million illegals. Obama needs them to vote so expect Obama to declare all voter ID laws nullified by EO and Holder to declare that he will not enforce any of them.
In early November.?
The fix is in.
Sure the fix is in. The secret police will be knocking at our doors any time soon. We already have political executions — “he’s dead to us.”
Remember what is at stake here, the Presidency of the United States. Obama will say and do anything to stay in power. Pandering and lying are no problem to him.
What we have here is the world’s only superpower being run like a banana republic.
I’m thinking that if word got out that all illegals were planning to vote Republican, the democrats would start building that wall along the Mexican border *yesterday*.
I’m always envisioned that manufacturers should build huge assembly factories smack middle of the US/Mexican boarders.? Grant these companies/manufacturers a Swiss-Pass exempting them from hiring illegals.? Exempt them from audits.? Exempt them from law enforcement scrutiny of Federal overseeing regulations.? Exempt carrying any form of I.D. or personal back ground history.
In the end, what we would recreate would be the “actual” Wild West.? The twist would be a Men’s Room, a Women’s Room and a Voter Booth side-by-side at each Plant or company.?? Migrants, citizens, infidels would have the ability to flush twice while punching a ballot three of four times during daily breaks. ? I could see a boom.? There would be an emphasis on hiring those with little to no slim bladder control as well.? Move votes, more pee.
Very scary scenario.
Something for a progressive liberal Democrat to love.