Comments on: Whoopi Goldberg, child advocate … but it’s not “RAPE rape”

By: Lazybum

Lazybum — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:09:11 +0000

Just for fun, replace Roman Polanski’s name with, say, Rush Limbaugh and try to imagine Woop-Dee-Do Goldberg saying the same thing….Not bloody likely, as they say across the pond.
Whoopi was an idiot, is an idiot and will surely remain an idiot.

By: Dimsdale

Dimsdale — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:06:13 +0000

Maybe people will now understand why liberals promote, rather than punish, egregious behavior in their Congresscritters and their Hollyweird types: they have no morality, no sense of right and wrong. See Che, Mumia, Polansky, the Castro licking pols, the double standards etc., etc.

By: Linda Mae

Linda Mae — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:17:12 +0000

This is just like the swarms of perverts who gathered around Letterman when he made his TWO jokes about Palin’s 14 year old daughter. The A-Rod and Spitzer comments were outlandish yet protected because he didn’t know -gag me with a spoon – it was the 14 year old and not the 18 year old –like it makes a difference –who was with Palin. Even though there were pictures on line of the family. Spitzer would never had been interested in the 18 year old since she was way older than the girls he supposedly had sex with. Whoopie is so wrong. Hopefully she will get loads of email telling her that some of us do NOT support sex between a child and an adult. That’s why we have laws.

By: Darlene

Darlene — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:09:11 +0000

I have never been impressed with Whoopi Goldberg, except maybe occasionally as an actress, but certainly not for her opinions and rhetoric. She has nothing else to offer, yet we give her a stage to speak this trash. Unbelievable! It is just unbelievable to me.

By: Dimsdale

Dimsdale — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:02:39 +0000

“Child rape-rape advocate” they mean.

I often wonder if liberals are “differently abled”, morally, anyway.