Whoopi Goldberg, child advocate … but it’s not “RAPE rape”

You may see this come up over the next day or so. You may have heard about Whoopi Goldberg’s assertion that Roman Polanski did not commit RAPE rape, whatever… But Toys r Us has a circular that defines Goldberg as a child advocate.

As a reminder, here is the video from The View yesterday. Goldberg wanted to get the facts straight, which is understandable, but come on … does it seem to you that the Hollywood elite and Europe’s upper-class are trying to justify or re-define what Polanski did?

My opinion is that Roman Polanski should be shamed, not adored. I’m not sure what Whoopi thinks, maybe she will clarify by the weekend. The real problem for many is Polanski continues to get accolades from those who cry to remove conservative talk show hosts from the airwaves. It just doesn’t sit well with people.

And here is your child advocate in one of the current Toys r Us circulars. Nothing more from me, you can comment on your own below.

toys-r-us-whoopi

Hat tip to the Howie Carr Show.

Posted in

Steve McGough

Steve's a part-time conservative blogger. Steve grew up in Connecticut and has lived in Washington, D.C. and the Bahamas. He resides in Connecticut, where he’s comfortable six months of the year.

5 Comments

  1. Dimsdale on September 30, 2009 at 4:02 pm

    "Child rape-rape advocate" they mean.

     

    I often wonder if liberals are "differently abled", morally, anyway.



  2. Darlene on September 30, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    I have never been impressed with Whoopi Goldberg, except maybe occasionally as an actress, but certainly not for her opinions and rhetoric.  She has nothing else to offer, yet we give her a stage to speak this trash.   Unbelievable!  It is just unbelievable to me. 



  3. Linda Mae on September 30, 2009 at 8:17 pm

    This is just like the swarms of perverts who gathered around Letterman when he made his TWO jokes about Palin's 14 year old daughter.  The A-Rod and Spitzer comments were outlandish yet protected because he didn't know -gag me with a spoon – it was the 14 year old and not the 18 year old –like it makes a difference –who was with Palin.  Even though there were pictures on line of the family.  Spitzer would never had been interested in the 18 year old since she was way older than the girls he supposedly had sex with.  Whoopie is so wrong.  Hopefully she will get loads of email telling her that some of us do NOT support sex between a child and an adult.  That's why we have laws.



  4. Dimsdale on October 1, 2009 at 5:06 am

    Maybe people will now understand why liberals promote, rather than punish, egregious behavior in their Congresscritters and their Hollyweird types: they have no morality, no sense of right and wrong.  See Che, Mumia, Polansky, the Castro licking pols, the double standards etc., etc.



  5. Lazybum on October 3, 2009 at 7:09 am

    Just for fun, replace Roman Polanski's name with, say, Rush Limbaugh and try to imagine Woop-Dee-Do Goldberg saying the same thing….Not bloody likely, as they say across the pond.

    Whoopi was an idiot, is an idiot and will surely remain an idiot.



The website's content and articles were migrated to a new framework in October 2023. You may see [shortcodes in brackets] that do not make any sense. Please ignore that stuff. We may fix it at some point, but we do not have the time now.

You'll also note comments migrated over may have misplaced question marks and missing spaces. All comments were migrated, but trackbacks may not show.

The site is not broken.