Comments on: Terrorist trial decision made six months ago by White House

By: Amber » Blog Archive » The Counter-Revolution in 2010

Amber » Blog Archive » The Counter-Revolution in 2010 — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:00:32 +0000

[...] As it turns out, the latter point is already unfolding. The lawyers for the 9/11 terrorists intend to plead not-guilty, and intend to use the trial to focus on American foreign policy. This, of course, becomes obviously what the entire trial was about…a manufactured crises designed to confuse and further demoralize the American people, since this strategy was thought out six months ahead of time. [...]

By: Steve McGough

Steve McGough — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:21:12 +0000

Sorry you feel I'm writing about inconsequential stuff. Lots of others covered what, where and why about the story and I seemed to be the first person to pick up on the fact Paterson said the decision was made - and he was told by the White House - six months ago.

If I had more time, I'd write more stuff. You'll have to deal with it. Just because I did not write about something does not mean I failed to recognize another issue.

By: Erik Blazynski

Erik Blazynski — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:01:11 +0000

How do you focus on this totally irrelevant sequence of events? This timing is not of any consequence. These are also not mutually exclusive events. Holder may not have PERSONALLY told the president until that day on AF1. They may have discussed and never settled on a final decision until that time. That is completely plausible. Not that it matters in any way. There are real substantive issues surrounding this story that you fail to recognize.

By: Erik Blazynski

Erik Blazynski — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:50:01 +0000

I can usually see both sides of a situation but I just don’t see it here. I listened to CSPAN today and Holder was question by the Senate on this decision. It seem that they selected NY because the detention facility is fortified as is the court building and there is direct access to the court room from the detention facility without having to transport the criminal. An Article III court was selected to show the world that we will give this guy a fair trial and subject him to our courts which are supposedly the most fair in the world.
Who gives a crap what the world thinks. I have hypnosis clients whose issues stem from their perception of what others think of them. As a country we are collectively psychologically screwing ourselves over.

By: Dimsdale

Dimsdale — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:02:33 +0000

So decisions made long ago, i.e. the terrorist disposition, they are trying to claim were just made (and unilaterally by Holder), while decisions that were just made, i.e. the decision to dump breast exams, they are trying to claim were in the works for a long time.

Does this administration EVER stop lying to us?

By: donh

donh — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:15:57 +0000

Has anyone checked the family background of Eric Holder? He sure does bear an uncanny physical resemblance to the Pesident of Syria Bashir Al Assad , as do his policy judgements.

By: Dimsdale

Dimsdale — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:35:18 +0000

I think plausible deniability and the benefit of the doubt went out the window with all of Obama’s campaign promises.

This is an administration of liars and schemers.