Racist component to Brown win in Massachusetts
Why, tell me WHY do liberals and the bozos like Keith Olbermann feel the need to bring up racial tension when race has nothing to do with the subject? In this example, media-types infer there was a racist component to last night’s results.
Update: Now two examples of media-nuts…
Let’s see. Martha Coakley … white. Scott Brown … white. Voters in Massachusetts electing Scott Brown? They must be racist. Maybe I’m stretching here a bit, but there is such an obvious pattern with these liberals you can not ignore it.
And I apologize in advance for bringing you my second post in two days mentioning Olbermann. Heck, Jim even mentioned him in a post so we really owe readers an apology.
Hat tip to Morrissey at Hot Air, who references The College Politico.
Morrissey notes…
That’s not “a good question,” it’s a baldfaced smear on the people of Massachusetts. They elect one Republican, and suddenly in Keith Olbermann’s eyes, everyone there wears a hood and burns crosses. It’s absurd, and Fineman should have said so immediately instead of playing along with Olbermann’s vicious fantasy world in which 201o Massachusetts has become 1966 Mississippi.
The transcript is over at Hot Air.
Second Example courtesy Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit who references Mediaite.
MSNBC again … commentator Donnie Deutsch thinks Massachusetts voters figured it was now OK go go and vote for a white guy again since President Obama is black and there have been female candidates.
We’re going back to basics, we’ve obviously had our first African American president we’ve had the female candidates and whatnot [and whatnot!] you look at him he looks like the candidate, the traditional view of the candidate, and is there a visceral comfort in that for people? I’m just curious from real kind of sociological point of view.
httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJsSBqiUzYQ
3 Comments
The website's content and articles were migrated to a new framework in October 2023. You may see [shortcodes in brackets] that do not make any sense. Please ignore that stuff. We may fix it at some point, but we do not have the time now.
You'll also note comments migrated over may have misplaced question marks and missing spaces. All comments were migrated, but trackbacks may not show.
The site is not broken.
It is called "reflexive racism" and it is an act of last resort for liberals. When they run out of arguments (usually about 1-2 layers down in a debate) or facts (rarely come in with any), they have to resort to ad hominem attacks to try and put their opponent on the defensive. It is a cheesy debating tactic, and is a clear signal that they have lost the debate.
The lunatic is on the grass
The lunatic is on the grass
Remembering games and daisy chains and laughs
Got to keep the loonies on the path
The lunatic is in the hall
The lunatics are in my hall
The paper holds their folded faces to the floor
And every day the paper boy brings more
And if the dam breaks open many years too soon
And if there is no room upon the hill
And if your head explodes with dark forbodings too
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon
The lunatic is in my head
The lunatic is in my head
You raise the blade, you make the change
You re-arrange me 'till I'm sane
You lock the door
And throw away the key
There's someone in my head but it's not me.
And if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear
You shout and no one seems to hear
And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9Ktgpi3gcA