Comments on: Prop. 8 bullies in California http://radioviceonline.com/prop-8-bullies-in-california/ The blog home of The Jim Vicevich Show Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:00:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jared http://radioviceonline.com/prop-8-bullies-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-896 Jared Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:49:39 +0000 http://www.radioviceonline.com/?p=3110#comment-896 Erik, As far as I can tell people were getting married long before the US of A was around to tax us and tell us how we should run our lives. Hmmm... I wonder who it was that went around marrying people? The church maybe? The government has no business validating or recognizing marriages. If wickens and satanists have religious practices that allow for marriage, let them do it... who cares? Erik,

As far as I can tell people were getting married long before the US of A was around to tax us and tell us how we should run our lives. Hmmm… I wonder who it was that went around marrying people? The church maybe? The government has no business validating or recognizing marriages. If wickens and satanists have religious practices that allow for marriage, let them do it… who cares?

]]> By: Shawn http://radioviceonline.com/prop-8-bullies-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-895 Shawn Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:33:17 +0000 http://www.radioviceonline.com/?p=3110#comment-895 you mean they got the restaurant to pay them. Well whaddayakonw...it IS just like the Civil Rights "Movement" of the 80s, 90s and today! you mean they got the restaurant to pay them.

Well whaddayakonw…it IS just like the Civil Rights "Movement" of the 80s, 90s and today!

]]> By: nick http://radioviceonline.com/prop-8-bullies-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-894 nick Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:12:55 +0000 http://www.radioviceonline.com/?p=3110#comment-894 I think that all us "breeders" SOMEHOW thinking that marriage is SOME SORT of social bedrock is ludicris. Until we get the "cajones" to ACTUALLY KEEP A PROMISE instead of needing to "find ourselves", lets just stop with this bull that marriage is a sacred vow. Around 55% of us just can't seem to follow through with the supposed biggest promise of our lives. I think that all us "breeders" SOMEHOW thinking that marriage is SOME SORT of social bedrock is ludicris. Until we get the "cajones" to ACTUALLY KEEP A PROMISE instead of needing to "find ourselves", lets just stop with this bull that marriage is a sacred vow. Around 55% of us just can't seem to follow through with the supposed biggest promise of our lives.

]]> By: Erik http://radioviceonline.com/prop-8-bullies-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-893 Erik Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:25:43 +0000 http://www.radioviceonline.com/?p=3110#comment-893 Jared, Marriage is a contract upheld by the state, you may have a religious ceremony but it is not required. If you show up at a church without a marriage license can you technically be married? I think not. I was not married in a church, I am not religious. Does that make my marriage less valid? I don't think so. What is next? You are going to select which religions are "valid" if I am married in a wicken ceremony is it valid? What about Satanic ceremony? -Erik Jared,

Marriage is a contract upheld by the state, you may have a religious ceremony but it is not required. If you show up at a church without a marriage license can you technically be married? I think not. I was not married in a church, I am not religious. Does that make my marriage less valid? I don't think so. What is next? You are going to select which religions are "valid" if I am married in a wicken ceremony is it valid? What about Satanic ceremony?

-Erik

]]> By: Jared http://radioviceonline.com/prop-8-bullies-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-892 Jared Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:52:15 +0000 http://www.radioviceonline.com/?p=3110#comment-892 The government should not be in the business of recognizing marriage at all (hetero OR homo). Marriage is a completely religious ritual, and has no place in government. There's no reason why married people should be treated differently than unmarried people. That is basic libertarianism... from Wikipedia: "libertarianism focuses on the rights of the individual to act in accordance with his or her subjective values" The government should not be in the business of recognizing marriage at all (hetero OR homo). Marriage is a completely religious ritual, and has no place in government. There's no reason why married people should be treated differently than unmarried people. That is basic libertarianism… from Wikipedia:

"libertarianism focuses on the rights of the individual to act in accordance with his or her subjective values"

]]> By: Okie Jim http://radioviceonline.com/prop-8-bullies-in-california/comment-page-1/#comment-891 Okie Jim Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:18:30 +0000 http://www.radioviceonline.com/?p=3110#comment-891 What's wrong with (these) people? Oh man, don't make me go there ... I might say something MOST politically incorrect :-) I'm not surprised. Scrape the "peace, love, and tolerance" veneer off of any militant, and you'll find a Nazi thug underneath. For a movement that seeks tolerance, these people are mighty intolerant, or so it seems. What's wrong with (these) people? Oh man, don't make me go there … I might say something MOST politically incorrect :-)

I'm not surprised. Scrape the "peace, love, and tolerance" veneer off of any militant, and you'll find a Nazi thug underneath.

For a movement that seeks tolerance, these people are mighty intolerant, or so it seems.

]]>