square-union-thug-cartoon

Police and Firefighter unions demand businesses publicly oppose Wisconsin governor

Wow. Here is another reason public unions should not be allowed to collectively bargain with politicians running a local or state government. Union leadership – including those from law enforcement and firefighters – have sent letters out to local businesses demanding they publicly oppose the efforts of Wisconsin’s legislature and governor or face the consequences.

Not only are they suggesting they publicly oppose the fiscal-sanity measures in Wisconsin, they are flat out telling them they will publicly boycott businesses who do not proactively do so. From James Taranto’s opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal yesterday.

In the letter to Wisconsin businessmen, however, we see why so-called collective bargaining is particularly corrupting to the police. Although the letter explicitly threatens only an economic boycott, when it is written on behalf of the police–of those on whom all citizens depend to protect their safety–it invariably raises the prospect of another kind of boycott. Can a businessman who declines this heavy-handed “request” be confident that the police will do their job if he is the victim of a crime–particularly if the crime itself is in retaliation for his refusal to support “the dedicated public employees who serve our communities”?

I’ve uploaded one of the letters [PDF, 100KB] for your convenience. In part – with my emphasis in bold – it reads…

The undersigned groups would like your company to publicly oppose Governor Walker’s efforts to virtually eliminate collective bargaining for public employees in Wisconsin. While we appreciate that you may need some time to consider this request, we ask for your response by March 17. In the event that you do not respond to this request by that date, we will assume that you stand with Governor Walker and against the teachers, nurses, police officers, fire fighters, and other dedicated public employees who serve our communities.

In other words, your silence means your business will be targeted with a public economic boycott. This is what the liberal/union/progressive/statist does. Threaten you, your business and your families economic security.

25 replies
  1. Plainvillian
    Plainvillian says:

    Beyond boycott, when these threats come from police and firefighters, isn't it implicit that those services might be withheld from those who do not comply with the "request"?  How is this not a protection racket?

    Wisconsin borders Illinois.  This is not extortion.  This is politics Chicago style, coming soon to a city and state near you.

  2. Don Lombardo
    Don Lombardo says:

    Al Capnoe would be proud of this "protection racket." Eric Holder won't be enforcing and RICO laws here. This has to be illegal.

  3. Dimsdale
    Dimsdale says:

    What was it that Øbama recently said about bullying?

     

    From http://www.bullying.gov:

    Bullying Others

    Becomes violent with others

    Gets into physical or verbal  fights with others

    Gets sent to the principal’s office or detention a lot

    Has extra money or new belongings that cannot be explained

    Is quick to blame others

    Will not accept responsibility for their actions

    Has friends who bully others

    Needs to win or be best at everything

     

    Any of this look familiar?  Where is the outcry?

  4. steve418r
    steve418r says:

    With the unions, the media, and underhanded voting techniques , the libs are going to be very hard to beat in any election.

    Hey, you know the mantra; Vote Democratic, get free stuff!!

  5. Shared Sacrifice
    Shared Sacrifice says:

    Hitler's Brownshirts evolved in same way… Paramilitary, Socialist Worker's Party, packing meetings with thugs, violently assaulting dissent, cracking sculls… One might wonder if this union pressure on businesses might precede some sort of Obama-Style-Kristallnacht (Night of Broken Glass)? Barry has mentioned need for a civilian police force just as powerful and well funded as the US military- probably to assist at polling places and such… Interesting parallel too is Germany's then debt due to reparations, while our debt due to feeding the union beasts that now terrorize us. Will Janet Napolitano be adding these disgruntled clowns to her terror watch list- along with veterans and tea party ppl?

  6. BEA
    BEA says:

    I laugh at the words "collectively bargain". They don't want to bargain…they want it their way and will force, bully, and threaten to get it. This is unbelievable.

  7. red923
    red923 says:

    Absolutely disgusting. The sooner we get rid of all Unions the better (I live in California and I belong to a union so I can say that wholeheartedly). While I won't be visiting Wisconsin any time soon, I would love to support the businesses who supported Governor Walker. I would like to use the unions' boycott list to support those businesses.

  8. Alamo BRuin
    Alamo BRuin says:

    That’s how the libtards celebrate fraternity with the other union thugs.  It is so nice to see firemen and cops support their brother in ilk.  If you don’t give enough they will consider you eligible for mistaken business or home invasion as the next step.
    Governor Walker should re-consider his decision about the mafia cops and engine polishers next time around.
     

  9. Emusia
    Emusia says:

    Scott Walker clearly misled the public during his campaign about his intention to bust the unions.  That's why the police and firefighters unions both supported Walker.  He miscalculated when he went to bust the teachers, nurses and other state worker unions though.  He thought by leaving the police and fire department out of it they would go along with him.  They have changed their minds.  

    Certainly there will be boycotts of all those corporations that supported Walker and it is important to let them know why they are being boycotted.  Of course, since Walker  misled everyone about his intentions during the campaign it seems only fair that companies be given a chance to redeem themselves to prevent being boycotted.

    The idea that this is union extortion is ridiculous.

    • Dimsdale
      Dimsdale says:

      Walker isn't busting the unions; he's breaking the choke hold they have on Wisconsin and other states.  A review of his campaign promises doesn't reveal any more "misleading" than any other politician (http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/article/2011/jan/01/look-scott-walkers-campaign-promises/).
       

      Maybe the Wisconsonites should consider how Jim Doyle, Walker's two term Democrat predecessor, might have misled them into the mess they find themselves.

       

      When the unemployment rate of the state workers is the same as that of the private sector, only then can they talk about shared sacrifice.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] the cops and firemen have sent a not-so-subtle message to the businesses of Wisconsin. In part it reads: The undersigned groups would like your company to publicly oppose Governor Walker’s efforts to […]

  2. […] reason why government employees should have NO collective “bargaining” rights?  Look no further: Wow. Here is another reason public unions should not be allowed to collectively bargain with […]

  3. […] that not just politicians, but businesses and individuals who’ve supported Governor Walker and the GOP in Wisconsin have been targeted […]

  4. […] reason why government employees should have NO collective “bargaining” rights?  Look no further: Wow. Here is another reason public unions should not be allowed to collectively bargain with […]

  5. […] Police And Firefighter Unions Demand Businesses Publicly Oppose Wisconsin Governor […]

  6. […] and Firefighter unions in Wisconsin sent a letter to business owners who donated to Governor Scott Walker’s campaign giving them two options: Publicly renounce […]

  7. […] unions Police and Firefighter unions demand businesses publicly oppose Wisconsin governor Police and Firefighter unions demand businesses publicly oppose Wisconsin governor | Radio Vice Onli… see my comments here; Union extortion? __________________ …all power is inherent in the […]

Comments are closed.