September 3, 2010

Now They Want Your 401k – Update From Conservative 247

Socialism? What socialism? Senator Orrin Hatch knows better. He kinda sounds desperate and I guess I understand why. The Democrats have proposed taxing 401ks, and instead imposing mandatory saving that will be placed in a government run pension program at … get this … 3%. And, as Hatch says, Republicans wont be able to stop them.

 

Update: Details from Steve at Conservative 247 below the fold.This from Steve at Conservative 247, and then read more at Hotair  here.

Under Ghilarducci’s plan, all workers would receive a $600 annual inflation-adjusted subsidy from the U.S. government but would be required to invest 5 percent of their pay into a guaranteed retirement account administered by the Social Security Administration. The money in turn would be invested in special government bonds that would pay 3 percent a year, adjusted for inflation. The current system of providing tax breaks on 401(k) contributions and earnings would be eliminated.

How to tank the stock market. And all of your current investments. Tell me when has the government ever run anything well. Think social security. The irony here is they are selling as protection against a tanking stock market, and the action alone will tank the market.

Related posts

About Jim Vicevich
Jim is a veteran broadcaster and conservative/libertarian blogger with more than 25 years experience in TV and radio. Currently, Jim's the host of The Jim Vicevich Show on WTIC 1080 in Hartford. Prior to radio, Jim worked as a business and financial reporter for NBC30 - the NBC owned TV station in Hartford - and as business editor at WFSB-TV in Hartford for 14 years while earning six Emmy nominations and three Telly Awards.

Comments

  1. Dimsdale says:

    Wasn’t the rate on the income tax when it was first implemented something like 3 -5%? Now look at it.

    There is no way, much as in the case of SSI, that the government will be able to look at that pile of cash and not say “we could spend it better.” Then they will hand us a bunch of IOUs for this nestegg too.

    Isn’t SSI enough? We have 401Ks because SSI is underperforming for the needs of retirees, and it has to be supplemented.

    I encourage you to look at the story of Galveston, which was able to opt out of SSI before the loophole closed. Check out the results.

    You will love this one, Jim!

    http://www.ncpa.org/ba/ba215.html

  2. Steve says:

    I posted about this too. Remember, it’s just a couple of Democrats that like the idea proposed by Teresa Ghilarducci, professor of economic-policy analysis at the New School for Social Research in New York. Social research? Other schools include general studies, management and urban policy, design, liberal arts, music, drama, and contemporary arts.

    Let’s just say the school’s professors don’t have privileges at Hillsdale.

    “I want to spend our nation’s dollar for retirement security better. Everybody would now be covered” if the plan were adopted, Ghilarducci said.

    It’s not your money Ghilarducci.

    Socialism? Check.

    http://conservative247.org/government/683/congress-wants-your-401k-tax-breaks-back.html

  3. Dave in EH says:

    Crooked as a dog’s leg.

    Remember — SSI ends up in cheaper paper than 3%. Eventually, this will end up in that sort of paper.

    Maybe Menken was right:

    “A national political campaign is better than the best circus ever heard of, with a mass baptism and a couple of hangings thrown in.”
    — H. L. Mencken

    Not necessarily the quote I was thinking of, but it will serve for the moment.

Your Comments

This section is for comments from the Radio Vice Online community of registered readers. Don't assume we agree with or endorse any particular comment posted by readers. Read the full Terms of Use on posting, and remember comments absolutely must be a comment about the post and should be no longer than 75 words. We find back and forth, tit for tat comments between readers pretty boring, and those comments could be deleted at any time.