"Who says so? Well just look at the JournoList story breaking the last couple of days by The Daily Caller; some suggest the FCC just not renew their broadcast license! A quick glance at the comments indicate many are commentators, but there is definitely hard news journalists chiming in.Want to say some of the JournoList comments are taken out of context? Sure, go ahead … if it makes it all good with you, that’s cool. Us “fu*&^%g Nascar retards” won’t mind a bit."

From Kathleen Parker, (fair to say she leans to the right?) in today's Hartford Courant:"One of the most widely circulated examples is that these lefties were conspiring to get the government to shut down Fox News. Well, one member did write something to that effect. But it was a query about whether the FCC could pull the network's broadcasting permit once it expires for, in liberals' view, espousing a political agenda. Whereupon, Michael Scherer of Time responded:"You really want political parties/white houses picking and choosing which news organizations to favor? Even so, the headline was that liberals want to shut down Fox News, which is not precisely an accurate rendering of a non-conversation. There was no further discussion on the subject at Journolist .Scandalous? Sure, if you want it to be. If you pull a few remarks from tens of thousands posted by 400 people over a few years, you can frame a debate any way you wish."

the link to her whole piece
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/hc-op-parker-…

I certainly do not want the Fairness Doctrine introduced to eradicate such lopsided scenarios. – Face it talk radio is almost the exact opposite ratio.

The Constitution and the right to free speech is the only fairness doctrine we need.

Like Fox, be prepared to be a target.  Be prepared, well educated.  Remember, the American people are fairly common sense and will see through the BS of those who talk about fairness but act otherwise.

Your comparison of Fox to Springer revealed your inherent bias and is a fine example of reductio ad absurdum.

Less "childish" but probably just as "pathetic", right, chris?

As for the length of my posts, if you don't like them, don't read them.  I like to cover all the bases, and can be a bit verbose at times, but we all have our crossed to bear.   I think yours are too short to adequately make your point.  Such is life.

I will go back to being childish and pathetic now.    (remembered this time!)

if you are not a sheep, you are "a troll".

Anyway, thanks, I enjoyed your comments-you make valid points.

And, Crissy is not an insult, tho you intended it to be-it IS my name.

And, as the righties do, you need to insult when you have nothing to reply, re: "bear skins and stone knives". Childish and pathetic.