<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Hoyer on Constitutional Law&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radioviceonline.com/hoyer-on-constitutional-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radioviceonline.com/hoyer-on-constitutional-law/</link>
	<description>The blog home of The Jim Vicevich Show</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 11:52:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The SOS begins her dissection of the Reid Health Care Bill:Reid on Constitutional Law &#124; Radio Vice Online</title>
		<link>http://radioviceonline.com/hoyer-on-constitutional-law/comment-page-1/#comment-6974</link>
		<dc:creator>The SOS begins her dissection of the Reid Health Care Bill:Reid on Constitutional Law &#124; Radio Vice Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radioviceonline.com/?p=17297#comment-6974</guid>
		<description>[...] of Obamacare based upon the remarks of Mr. Hoyer (D. Md.) and Ms. Pelosi (D. Ca.).  Mr. Hoyer insisted that the mandate that all have insurance was clearly constitutional based upon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Obamacare based upon the remarks of Mr. Hoyer (D. Md.) and Ms. Pelosi (D. Ca.).  Mr. Hoyer insisted that the mandate that all have insurance was clearly constitutional based upon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DuffTerrall</title>
		<link>http://radioviceonline.com/hoyer-on-constitutional-law/comment-page-1/#comment-6669</link>
		<dc:creator>DuffTerrall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radioviceonline.com/?p=17297#comment-6669</guid>
		<description>In what way does my level of health affect the general welfare? If I am sick, I suffer, perhaps those who have chosen to depend on me suffer (though that is their personal choice and thus is again, not public), but aside from that the matter of medical care is one of private, not public interest. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what way does my level of health affect the general welfare? If I am sick, I suffer, perhaps those who have chosen to depend on me suffer (though that is their personal choice and thus is again, not public), but aside from that the matter of medical care is one of private, not public interest. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Spending Clause &#8211; Article I, Section 8 &#8211; and the general welfare &#124; Radio Vice Online</title>
		<link>http://radioviceonline.com/hoyer-on-constitutional-law/comment-page-1/#comment-6616</link>
		<dc:creator>The Spending Clause &#8211; Article I, Section 8 &#8211; and the general welfare &#124; Radio Vice Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radioviceonline.com/?p=17297#comment-6616</guid>
		<description>[...] the Sound Off Sister providing legal commentary on the General Welfare clause, I thought I&#8217;d toss in my opinion since the subject is closely tied to my Symptom of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Sound Off Sister providing legal commentary on the General Welfare clause, I thought I&#8217;d toss in my opinion since the subject is closely tied to my Symptom of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Pelosi on Constitutional Law&#8221; &#124; Radio Vice Online</title>
		<link>http://radioviceonline.com/hoyer-on-constitutional-law/comment-page-1/#comment-6586</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Pelosi on Constitutional Law&#8221; &#124; Radio Vice Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radioviceonline.com/?p=17297#comment-6586</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote a post last week entitled &#8220;Hoyer on Constitutional Law&#8221; which dealt with the constitutionality of the power of Congress to mandate that all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote a post last week entitled &#8220;Hoyer on Constitutional Law&#8221; which dealt with the constitutionality of the power of Congress to mandate that all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimsdale</title>
		<link>http://radioviceonline.com/hoyer-on-constitutional-law/comment-page-1/#comment-6574</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimsdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radioviceonline.com/?p=17297#comment-6574</guid>
		<description>If these guys believe that the Constitution is a &quot;living, breathing document&quot;, then they are applying the same crappy health care to it that they want to foist on the rest of us, with similar results. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If these guys believe that the Constitution is a &quot;living, breathing document&quot;, then they are applying the same crappy health care to it that they want to foist on the rest of us, with similar results. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obamacare: Shameful Backroom Deals And Unconstitutional? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://radioviceonline.com/hoyer-on-constitutional-law/comment-page-1/#comment-6568</link>
		<dc:creator>Obamacare: Shameful Backroom Deals And Unconstitutional? &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radioviceonline.com/?p=17297#comment-6568</guid>
		<description>[...] “Hoyer on Constitutional Law” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Hoyer on Constitutional Law” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

