September 3, 2010

A liberal trifecta – climate change, stem cells and not drilling for oil

Many people look on Monday with dread and gloom, but for the next couple of years I think I need to replace T.G.I.F. with D.G.I.F. – “Dear God,  it’s Friday.”   This afternoon while driving down the street on a quick errand, I was treated to the following three stories on WTIC:

1) EPA Takes First Step Toward Regulating Pollution Linked to Climate Change (FoxNews.com)
WASHINGTON — The debate on global warming is set to heat up again with the Obama administration’s release on Friday of an EPA proposed finding that carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases are a danger to public health and welfare.

The finding is the first step to regulating pollution linked to climate change.

2) Guidelines for broader stem cell research unveiled (CNN.com)
WASHINGTON (CNN) — The Obama administration released a draft of guidelines for federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research Friday.

Under the new guidelines, federal funding would be allowed only for research using human embryonic stem cells from embryos created solely for reproductive purposes by in vitro fertilization. The embryos would have to no longer be needed for reproduction, and the donors would have to consent to their use for research.

3) Appeals Court Cancels Drilling Program Off Alaska Coast (FoxNews.com)
WASHINGTON — A program to expand oil and gas drilling off the Alaska coast was canceled Friday by a federal appeals court that ruled the Bush administration did not properly study the environmental impact.

A three-judge panel in Washington found that the Bush-era Interior Department failed to consider the effect on the environment and marine life before it began the process in August 2005 to expand an oil and gas leasing program in the Beaufort, Bering, and Chukchi seas.

Ah, Friday afternoon – the end of the weekly news cycle and the best time to bury stories that you want to keep in the shadows.

To think that these three topics were the focus of such outrage from the left for weeks on end during the Bush administration and during the election.  So now that “good” has finally triumphed, why does this come up on a Friday afternoon?  These should be the lead stories on Monday so that proper accolades can be given to those fearless Obama administration officials dedicated to righting the wrongs.

“Here, here!” the media should shout, ” We’ll have no drilling in Alaska thank you very much.  Especially now that Obama is on the path for green energy.”

“And hurrah! Taxpayers can finally fund experiments on humans, but of course we can’t condone embryo factories – that would be too obvious.   So we’ll just have to compensate the fertility clinics then.  That’s good, they can use the extra cash.”

“And who would have thought that the old joke could come true?  Finally a way to tax every one’s last breath!  Brilliant job guys and gals!”

I can only say, D.G.I.F.

The right thing or the smart thing

I have long since given up on looking to Hollywood for moral lessons that I feel are relevant to my life or even reflect what I consider America to be. I do not need to be endlessly reminded of the racial prejudice laced throughout pre-civil rights America. I do not need to see another TV show that demonizes big corporations, the greedy rich or those of faith. And I certainly do not need to sit through another movie that portrays America as a malevolent force responsible for the evils spread throughout the world.

In the reality outside of Hollywood, the country has made great progress in race relations, big corporations provide life saving and improving products, those of faith illustrate moral standards that many on the left simply cannot understand or will not face and America continues to sacrifice its own children to liberate others.

So imagine my surprise when a short scene from the Sci-Fi Channel’s “Battlestar Galactica” continues echo in my mind for several weeks and has direct relevance to the times we live in today. In the scene, Lee Adama, the son of the fleet Admiral and the moral compass of the show is advising the ailing president on how to rebuild the government after a recent coup left the people without elected representation. The president approves of his plan, but suggests that Lee should organize the new regime himself. Taken aback, he says, “I would be honored if you think I’m the right one.”

“You are the right one, Lee. You have always been the right one. My only concern about you is that you’re so hell-bent on doing the right thing, that you sometimes don’t do the smart thing.”

For those who tend to view the world in black and white, this dialog is a stark reminder that when survival is paramount, shades of gray may be the “smart” choice.

In a perfect world, the right thing would be the smart thing. But ours is not a perfect world and I am sure that it is this rationale that allows those with questionable moral frameworks to justify their daily assault on their fellow human beings. To name just a few: Tort lawyers who bring frivolous law suits against big corporations knowing that the consumers eventually foot the bill. Teacher’s unions that insist on maintaining an iron grip on modern public education despite the obvious decline in standards and quality for our children. Wall Street moguls who buy and sell products that they know to be worthless but will be the next sucker’s problem. And politicians who routinely spin, distort or outright lie to solidify their own power base despite the havoc wreaked on the country whenever government steps in with a heavy hand and dollar signs in its eyes.

I cannot begin to guess what goes through the minds of such people or how they find solace in their own conscience. This is not for me to judge. The simple fact is that as long as people have freedom, some will be free to take advantage of others. However, the alternative of living in a socialist dictatorship where there is no crime yet no freedom is not a solution either. Even if a government has good intentions, its efforts to punish those few who may deserve it inevitably trickles down to the larger population who have done nothing but live their own lives.

So this simple scene in an excellent science fiction show reflects a choice that all Americans must now face. Thanks to the Democrats in Congress, our new president and the Stimulus Bill, we all must now choose between the right thing or the smart thing. Whether you agree or disagree with the president’s stated or presumed principles of social justice, wealth redistribution or America’s reputation in the world, the facts are the same. An enormous amount of wealth will be stripped from those who have earned it and transferred to those who have not. Some industries will be attacked while will others kneel to receive the blessings of an enlightened government. And most perniciously, the enormous spending spree we are engaged in and the inevitable inflation that follows will literally steal the fortunes of our children before they are even conceived.

The sad fact is that unless a major electoral shift occurs in 2010, this will happen. So the “smart” thing is to default on your mortgage so others will pay it down. The “smart” thing is to invest in and work for green industries, construction or broadband suppliers. The “smart” thing is to not work too hard because if you succeed you will be targeted. But each and every dollar transferred is taken from the pockets of others who had it forcefully stripped away or from our very own children who have yet to be born. If you forgive the analogy, government sanctioned blood-money.

In many ways this administration has given the country a unique gift, a clarifying moment that illuminates the false facade that “big government” erects to insulate the consciences of those who accept aid from those who provide it. Creeping entitlements and new, relatively small programs have up until now provided the brick and mortar of the facade. But President Obama and Speaker Pelosi are now building the wall so fast and so high that it is no longer just a backdrop in our lives. It is front and center for all to see. And at its base, an ATM machine with a sign that reads “Free for those that qualify”.

As a nation, we can no longer afford to pretend that the wall is not there. We can no longer pretend that we do not know from whom the money comes. And for better or for worse, we must all decide between the right thing or the smart thing.

State Legislature sets sights on Roman Catholic Church – Update

Well, it seems as if President Obama isn’t the only one who wants to reshape our institutions in new and “progressive” ways.  The Judiciary Committee of the CT General Assembly will hold a public hearing on March 11 at noon in Room 2C of the Legislative Office Building in Hartford concerning Raised S.B. number 1098.

Update: The hearing scheduled for March 11 concerning this bill has been canceled.

This bill would require Roman Catholic parishes to elect Boards of Directors from its lay community who will govern financial and budgetary matters, long-term capital improvement and outreach to the community among other responsibilities. The archbishop or bishop can send ex officio (non-voting) members and the pastor must report to the Board with respect to administrative or financial matters. In other words, the pastor works for the Board.

Of course, there is the obligatory – this act shall not affect the clergy’s power in matters exclusively to religious tenets or practices. Nice. I guess the Legislature believes that sticking financial bureaucracies between the clergy and its parishioners does not affect the Apostolic nature of the Catholic Church.

Also of particular interest is the final section that gives the Attorney General the authority to investigate a parish if “Any person having reason to believe that monetary contributions” are being misappropriated and not being used for the purposes given.  I suppose the Attorney General will be able to read the minds of the parishioners to know why they were giving their hard earned income thereby knowing if the funds are being misappropriated relative to the purposes given. (But that’s probably why we have all of those multi-colored donation envelopes).

I suppose this is all part of the “change” that Obama voters were looking for and the Legislature is just following suit. After all Socialism abhors Religion, so let’s try to tear that apart shall we?

Update (by Steve): Morrissey over at Hot Air picked up on this topic this morning, as did Jack Fowler over at The Corner. More than 75 percent of Americans associate themselves as Christians, and Roman Catholics make up more than 20 percent of the population.

These groups are quite vocal. I have a hunch we’ll be hearing more about this subject not only in Connecticut, but nationwide during the next few days.

Update (by Jim): The hearing is set for Wednesday at the LOB at noon and Parishes across the state are sending bus loads of people to the hearing. Representative Lawlor told us yesterday that he’s not sponsoring the bill … he just wants to give it a hearing. Well it looks like that’s just what he will get … from a lot of folks.

Presumably this bill just sprung up from some concerned Catholics … and presumably this bill just suddenly got a hearing. I would presume that this bill has some backing in the legislature … or it would not be there. Don’t buy into the “it’s an orphan bill” bit. It’s got a Daddy.

An appeal to Obama supporters

Now that we are at the eve of the presidential election, the magnitude of this moment looms large over us all. As a conservative I have watched in awe and horror at the scope of the liberal propaganda machine in this country. Obama’s $618 million fund raising, shadowy support from wealthy liberal donors, true-believers in Hollywood, a Democrat party devoid of any sense of honor and fair-play and a mainstream media that has laid bare any pretense of objectivity appears to be too formidable a force to overcome in the final weeks of this campaign.

[Read more...]